Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Goode v. Hale County Sheriff
as 5:2022cv00280
Petitioner:
Stanley R Goode
Respondent:
Hale County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Schroeder v. DHHS Executive Director et al
as 4:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schroeder
Defendant:
DHHS Executive Director, Dr. Kelly R. Goodness, Flint David Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Youngkin et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dezachtre R. Goode
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Sears and Jason Miyaris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Goode v. 10th Judicial District et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dezachtre R. Goode
Defendant:
10th Judicial District, Mecklenberg Commonwealth Attorney and Buddy A. Warp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Good v. USA
as 4:2021cv00078
Petitioner:
Michael R Good
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GOODE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74583
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R GOODE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Village of Camden, Ohio v. Cargill, Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00273
Defendant:
R. Good Rentals, LLC, Cargill, Incorporated, Good Rail & Truck Transfer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Village of Camden, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46831
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R GOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goode v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2020cv00519
Defendant:
Lt. Blakenketship, Ofc. Whitaker and Sgt. Siriley
Plaintiff:
Dezachtre R. Goode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hoey et al
as 3:2020cv00737
Defendant:
B.M. Antonelli, Dr. S. Hoey, Christopher Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Delvon Lamar Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
