Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BASKIN v. GUYTON et al
as 3:2021cv00601
Defendant:
R LAMBERT, A MYERS, K CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEE BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baskin v. Guyton et al
as 8:2021cv00314
Defendant:
A. Adyoshov, R. Guyton, A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Baskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambert v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al.
as 3:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Lambert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Pennsylvania Lines, LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lambert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Lambert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAMBERT v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2018cv00026
Petitioner:
DAVID R. LAMBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAMBERT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01686
Petitioner:
DAVID R LAMBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAMBERT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03929
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE R. LAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Claman v. Torrey Oaks Golf Course, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02292
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Claman
Defendant:
Torrey Oaks Golf Course, Inc. , William R. Lambert, Jr. , Marie Z. Labert and others
Mediator:
Mark A. Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Lambert et al
as 1:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall L. Lambert, Steven R. Lambert, Joe Elswick and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
