Cases 11 - 20 of 50
LYNCH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2019cv08412
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LYNCH v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
BOBBY R. LYNCH
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynch v. Haupt
as 1:2018cv01471
Plaintiff:
Michael R Lynch
Defendant:
Brady M Haupt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leslie Lynch v. Randy Blade
as 17-35661
Petitioner - Appellant:
LESLIE R. LYNCH
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Bridges v. Page et al
as 5:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
Delbert D Bridges
Defendant:
Robert Page, B Rodeen, E Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2016cv03567
Plaintiff:
Minda R. Lynch
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Makell Paulk and Tedric Paulk
Cross_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Tedric Paulk and Makell Paulk
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Minda R. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lynch v. Blades
as 1:2015cv00598
Petitioner:
Leslie R. Lynch
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reeves v. Lynch et al
as 5:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reeves
Defendant:
R Lynch, Shah, Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12404
Plaintiff:
Kathy P. Lynch and Charles R. Lynch, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
