Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Barrett v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04067
Plaintiff:
Donnie R. Barrett
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Jeremie Seymour, Krista Wilcoxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Tagle v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 17-15110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Manuel Tagle-Moreno
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, ARTINGER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Richard Glunk v. R. Noone, et al
as 17-1063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD P. GLUNK, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BARRETT NOONE, M.D., SCOTT M. GOLDMAN, M.D., MARIE VANBUSKIRK and others
Sarratt v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv03486
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sarratt
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P Stirling and Sandra R Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Scott et al
as 4:2016cv04206
Plaintiff:
Donnie R Barrett
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Jan & or John Doe, James C. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Great West Casualty Company et al
as 3:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
Patrick R. Barrett
Defendant:
Great West Casualty Company, Mario Ontiveros and Spirit Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barrett v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04085
Plaintiff:
Donnie R Barrett
Defendant:
James T Dimas, Lorrie Rickman-Jones, Kristine Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Scott
as 3:2016cv03073
Petitioner:
Donnie R Barrett
Respondent:
Gregg Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lashawn Pettus-Brown v. Ethna Cooper, et al
as 15-4380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LASHAWN PETTUS-BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHNA M. COOPER, JOSEPH T. DETERS, JIM NEIL and others
Lance Ealy v. Michael Barrett, et al
as 15-4358
Petitioner - Appellant:
LANCE EALY
Respondent - Appellee:
THE HONORABLE JUDGE MICHAEL R. BARRETT, UNITED STATES MARSHALS' OFFICE and SHERRIFF RICHARD JONES, Butler County Jail
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
