Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Grampus v. DW et al
as 6:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
Marquis Grampus
Defendant:
Harouff DW, R Blakey, Sgt Zappola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Blake v. Ladezma et al
as 6:2021cv00881
Plaintiff:
Ethelyn R. Blake
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Ladezma and Officer FNU Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennington v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2018cv01348
Defendant:
Jane Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), John Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), Ryan J. Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Jane Doe(s) and Jonathan Lawrence Dennington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Machado
as 6:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ethelyn R. Blake
Defendant:
FNU Machado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalu Kalu v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc, et al
as 15-1427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALU ORJI KALU
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, P. JUSTER, SSIM, Federal Bureau of Prisons, SCOTT R. BLAKE, Asst. Field Office Director, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Immigrantion and Customs Enforcement and others
Blake v. Montgomery County Jail
as 4:2014cv02807
Plaintiff:
Terry R Blake
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Bennett et al
as 1:2014cv02476
Plaintiff:
Donta Vaughn
Defendant:
Ray Bennett, Stephanie R. Blake, The State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horace Crump v. Amy Best, et al
as 12-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORACE W. CRUMP
Defendant - Appellee:
AMY BEST, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, SCOTT FREED, Hearing Officer, JAMES ZUMMER, Resident Unit Manager and others
Crump v. Best et al
as 2:2010cv13787
Plaintiff:
Horace Crump
Defendant:
Amy Best, Scott Freed, James Zummer and others
Rodrigues v. Blake et al
as 1:2007cv00464
Petitioner:
Goncalo Nuno Rodrigues
Respondent:
Scott R. Blake, Thomas Duren and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
