Cases 71 - 80 of 104
Darryl Duncan v. John Evan
as 10-3082
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden
Jones v. Massee et al
as 5:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Bill Massee, Jeff Petty, Montien R Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Duncan v. Pat Quinn, et al
as 10-2554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT QUINN, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, PAUL MCCRAY and others
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS,etc. v. BALDWIN, et.al.
as 2:2010cv00800
Plaintiff:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Defendant:
ARTHUR BALDWIN , LINDA COBB , JEROME BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Duncan v. Quinn et al
as 3:2010cv03124
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Duncan
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Michael Randle, . Buscher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DUNCAN ET AL. v. AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv88576
Plaintiff:
DONNIS R. DUNCAN and LINDA DUNCAN
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Type:
Civil Rights
Duncan v. Magelssen, et al
as 09-1253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MAGELSSEN and CAPTAIN WATTS
Duncan et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
Staci R. Duncan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
