Cases 1 - 10 of 10
M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS, INC v. STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2021cv00120
Defendant:
STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC v. STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2021cv00851
Plaintiff:
M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS, INC., and M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC
Defendant:
STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00945
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
SHOSHANNA R. HIGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
United States of America v. High, Daryl et al
as 3:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daryl E. High, Glenda R. High, Rhoda Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Calhoun v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2010cv03105
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Calhoun
Defendant:
J. Sanchez, R. High, C. J. Tschabold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holladay City v. Tyler et al
as 2:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
Holladay City
Defendant:
Ina W. Tyler, Richard H. and Ina W. Tyler Revocable Trust, Tee W. Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
