Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Reeves v. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reeves
Defendant:
R Lynch, Shah, Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. Bowie County Correctional Center
as 5:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Robbie Daniels
Defendant:
Bowie County Correctional Center, Community Edition Center, Sheriff Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Weissmann v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Senta Weissmann
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Catherine A. Lesjak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tola v. Lynch et al
as 4:2012cv06423
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tola
Defendant:
Michael R Lynch, Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Scott v. Wood et al
as 3:2012cv01242
Plaintiff:
Benjamin K Scott
Defendant:
Marsha Wood, R Lynch, L Winsor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pokoik v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 4:2012cv06074
Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company , Autonomy Corporation PLC, Deloitte LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Espinoza v. Lynch et al
as 5:2012cv06025
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza
Defendant:
Michael R Lynch, Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Riccardi v. Lynch et al
as 5:2012cv06003
Plaintiff:
Philip Riccardi
Defendant:
Michael R Lynch, Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
