Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bryant et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as DOE 1 et al
as 3:2020cv07282
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as DOE 1, Grocery Outlet, Kaiser Permanente International and others
Plaintiff:
Shelly Owens, Cosme D. Escamilla, Paul A. Poehling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nicholson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01387
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Isiah R. Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Thomas Heilman v. D. McAlister, et al
as 19-56123
Defendant / Appellee:
R. OCHOA, Appeals Coordinator (CC-II), individual/official capacity, MELANIE MILLER, Superior Court Clerk, individual/official capacity, R. W. TOMPKINS, individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN
Thomas John Heilman v. D. H. McAlister et al
as 2:2018cv06569
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
Captain D. H. McAlister, R. Ochoa, X. Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaz Jamar MacFalling v. D. Nettleton et al
as 2:2017cv02399
Defendant:
Biallas, Biallas, J. Core and others
Plaintiff:
Chaz Jamar MacFalling
Hamilton v. Urban et al.
as 2:2016cv00547
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Hamilton
Defendant:
Urban, M. Trujillo, A. Dillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson et al v. XTO/Exxon
as 4:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Nicholson and Daniel Nicholson
Defendant:
XTO/Exxon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NICHOLSON v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv00309
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R NICHOLSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Nicholson v. Wallace
as 4:2012cv01325
Petitioner:
Michael R. Nicholson
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
