Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Patton v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
James R. Patton
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Karen Ramey, Rick Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04859
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Patton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv12360
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Johnson
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, George Stephenson, Eric Herbert and others
Carrodine v. Michigan Department of Correction's State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv12265
Plaintiff:
James Edward Carrodine
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Correction's State Prison, Macomb Correctional Facility Employee's Food Service Department, Brandon Warriner and others
Patton v. Hot Spring County Jail
as 6:2021cv06039
Defendant:
Hot Spring County Jail
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Crain, et al
as 6:2021cv06019
Defendant:
Gregory K. Crain and Hot Spring County, Arkansas
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 6:2021cv06008
Defendant:
Arkansas Community of Correction, Dr. Beryl Rushefsky, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Lingo et al
as 6:2020cv06168
Defendant:
Captain Josh Lingo and Sheriff Mike Cash
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. HERITAGE TRAILS CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2020cv00598
Defendant:
R. PATTON, T. LOVELL and HERITAGE TRAILS CORR. FACILITY
Plaintiff:
BRUCE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Patton et al
as 2:2020cv00048
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Sky R. Patton and Jessica Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
