Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Augustus Rose, Jr. v. Sherwood Bauer, Jr., et al
as 22-13719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUGUSTUS ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERWOOD BAUER, JR., DAN L. VAUGHN, MICHAEL CARLTON HEISEY and others
Rose v. Bauer et al
as 2:2022cv14009
Plaintiff:
Augustus Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Dan Lewis Vaughn, Michael Carlton Heisey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv04275
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Richardson
Defendant:
The State of New York, The Department of Correction and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell, Sean v. Richardson, Reed et al
as 3:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Brandon Drost, H. Mellenberger, K. Spletter and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Fitzgerald Rowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. PERRY et al
as 4:2019cv00494
Defendant:
A PERRY, K WASHINGTON, WAKULLA CI ANNEX and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO R RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Greg C Jeter, Tommy D Chisum, Tommy R Tobias and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hunter v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv01101
Defendant:
Gabriel Williams, N. Malakkla, Raul R. Recarey and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. Snyder et al
as 2:2017cv14093
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Heidi Washington, Melinda Bramen and others
Jones et al v. Sanks et al
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roland Jones, Keith Sade, Jason Ellis and others
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Nathan Brooks, Robin Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickner v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Shelby R. Richardson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
