Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Rodney Roberts v. County of Essex, et al
as 23-1136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RODNEY R. ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DETECTIVE DERRICK EUTSEY
Roberts v. Newton et al
as 1:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Katie R Roberts
Defendant:
Jennifer Newton, Mathew J Roth, Donna M Spear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. City of Ranson, West Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00221
Defendant:
William Roper, Robbie R. Roberts, Ranson City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patrick v. Sanders et al
as 9:2020cv82018
Defendant:
Mr. Jose R Robert and Mr. Kurt M Sanders
Plaintiff:
Mr. Keith L Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patrick v. Sanders et al
as 2:2020cv14394
Defendant:
Jose R Robert and Kurt M Sanders
Plaintiff:
Keith L Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marquez et al v. Burdine et al
as 2:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Andrew Burdine, Nathan Griffiths, Tyler Lloyd and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Concepcion Garcia Sanchez, Enrique Moises Yanez Garcia, Gilberto Noe Yanez Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irwin v. Santiago et al
as 3:2019cv02926
Defendant:
Officer B.J. Ivy, Officer J. Santiago, Officer R. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Back Doctors, Ltd.
as 3:2017cv00777
Defendant:
Back Doctors, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
ROBERTS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2015cv07061
Plaintiff:
RODNEY R. ROBERTS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
