Cases 1 - 10 of 220
Kendall Smith v. U.S. Judge Paula Xinis
as 24-1365
Plaintiff:
KENDALL R. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. JUDGE PAULA XINIS, STATE OF MARYLAND and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Stephanie R. Smith
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mellotte v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Randall Mellotte
Defendant:
Ofc. M. Reyes, Ofc. R. Smith, Lt. G. Forney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davies et al v. Smith
as 2:2024cv01641
Plaintiff:
James Davies and Birgit Davies
Defendant:
Michael R Smith and 2013 Key West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Steven R Smith v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01091
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robert Gravatt, III v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 23-1485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GRAVATT, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, CAROLINE E. HEADEN, EDWARD B. LATTNER and others
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kendall Smith v. NewRez LLC
as 23-1000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDALL R. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
NEWREZ LLC and NORTH STAR PROPERTIES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
