Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mellotte v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Randall Mellotte
Defendant:
Ofc. M. Reyes, Ofc. R. Smith, Lt. G. Forney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Darian Foster
Defendant:
Client Davis, Steve Herrick, Ross Mauice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, Carl Manis and R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Carter et al
as 0:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Smith
Defendant:
Stacy Carter, Eric Flavor, Audra Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boddie v. Irviza et al
as 5:2021cv00207
Defendant:
Unit Manager R. Smith, Grand Prarie, A.W. Rich and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan Regan Boddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Nottoway Correctional Center Medical Department, Providers, and Staff et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
R. Smith, Nurse Practitioner Bendall, P. McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Taylor
as 1:2020cv01907
Respondent:
Warden Edsel Taylor
Petitioner:
James R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
