Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04986
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pierce v. Reyes
as 3:2021cv00539
Defendant: Gaylynn Reyes, Jaclyn Reyes, Jaclyn Houston and others
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF R.A.H, A MINOR
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Amis Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Almaklani v. Nielsen
as 21-1265
Plaintiff: Sanad Al-Salami, Kaseem Almaklani, Ahmed Shariff and others
Defendant: Lee Francis Cissna, Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kristjen Nielsen and Jeffrey Sessions
Defendant / Appellee: Donald W. Neufeld, Unknown Named USCIS Employees, United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fadh Nagi Saeed, Taiba Salem Abdulla and Kadijah Saeed
Reyes et al v. United States Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00183
Plaintiff: Gay Lynn Reyes and R.A.H.
Defendant: United States Attorney General, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, Mississippi Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2582
Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2581
Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1487
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?