Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronaldo Elias Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1755
Petitioner:
RONALDO ELIAS DA SILVA, CRISTINA APARECIDA DE LANA SILVA, E. R.D.S and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rivera-Santiago v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Norma Iris Rivera Santiago, United States of America, Norma Iris Rivera-Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Health Care Qualty Improvement Act of 1986
Rooster Products International, Inc. v. R.D.S. Industries, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00248
Defendant:
R.D.S. Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rooster Products International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Slote et al v. Wilton Reassurance Life Company of New York et al
as 2:2008cv04154
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann Slote, Judith Ann Slote, P.A.K. and others
Defendant:
Wilton Reassurance Life Company of New York, Wilton Reassurance Life Company of New York, Liberty Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
R.D.S. Industries v. The Rooster Group
as 2:2007cv04585
Plaintiff:
R.D.S. Industries, R.D.S. Industries and R.D.S. Industries
Defendant:
The Rooster Group
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
American Life Insurance Company of New York v. Karnes et al
as 2:2007cv04053
Plaintiff:
American Life Insurance Company of New York and American Life Insurance Company of New York
Defendant:
Jim Karnes, John Thomas Reed, P.A.K. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
