Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TRUSSELL v. MONMOUTH COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE TRUSSELL
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, SHAUN GOLDEN, THEOADORE FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
DOE v. GOLDEN et al
as 3:2021cv19600
Plaintiff:
C.V. JANE DOE
Defendant:
SHERIFF SHAUN GOLDEN, CHIEF JEFFREY EQUILS, OFFICER THOMAS MAURO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Wilcox et al
as 6:2019cv01263
Defendant:
Gordon Ramsey, Gregg Wilcox, Kurt Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steve Kim, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01493
Plaintiff:
Steve Kim , Erica S. Laforce , Robert Maciel and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Kim, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as CAC/2:17-cv-01408
Plaintiff:
Steve Kim , Erica S. Laforce , Robert Maciel and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Steve Kim, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01408
Plaintiff:
Steve Kim, Colene King, Erica S. Laforce and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Laveida Jones v. Randolph County, AR, et al
as 15-2963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laveida Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Randolph County, Arkansas, David Jansen, in his official capacity, Randy Patterson, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
