Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Chavis Rashad Williams
Defendant:
Eric Young, Leslie Powell and Wyant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Troup County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Rashad Williams
Defendant:
Troup County Jail and OFC Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shkolir et al v. RX2GO, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07256
Plaintiff:
Ellie Shkolir, Rashad Williams and Evgenii Badgaev
Defendant:
RX2GO, Inc. and Erkin Sattarov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS-SIMMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21436
Plaintiff:
RASHAD WILLIAMS-SIMMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rashad Williams v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHAD WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Scott et al v. Mobilelink Louisiana, LLC
as 3:2020cv00826
Plaintiff:
Corey Scott, Rashad Williams, Steven Williams and others
Defendant:
Mobilelink Louisiana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAMS-SIMMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08436
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAD WILLIAMS-SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00663
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN WETZEL, JOHN/JANE DOE'S and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00653
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Michael Oppman, Jane Doe, - and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
