Cases 1 - 10 of 1,132
Ratliff v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2024cv02757
Defendant:
Louisiana State and Hammond City
Plaintiff:
Kentdrick D Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Ratliff v. Republic National Distributing Company, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02740
Defendant:
Tyler Hayden and Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Emily Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shelby v. Ratliff et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Mr. Unknown Heath, Aaron Legrande, Unknown Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shelby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Caleb H. Ratliff, Mark Wallace, Craig Burnes and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. Ratliff
as 5:2024cv06146
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Burgess
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NYP, LLC v. FROST et al
as 2:2024cv10028
Defendant:
NYP, LLC doing business as NYP CORP., MARK FROST and JAMES RATLIFF
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Burgess v. Ratliff
as 5:2024cv06136
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff v. Lyde et al
as 7:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
edward Michael ratliff
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, John Swenson, Jose Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burgess v. Ratliff
as 2:2024cv00077
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-2832
Defendant:
KATHY ASHCRAFT, LISA WILLIAMS, ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RATLIFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
