Cases 1 - 10 of 1,127
Shelby v. Ratliff et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Mr. Unknown Heath, Aaron Legrande, Unknown Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shelby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Caleb H. Ratliff, Mark Wallace, Craig Burnes and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NYP, LLC v. FROST et al
as 2:2024cv10028
Defendant:
NYP, LLC doing business as NYP CORP., MARK FROST and JAMES RATLIFF
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Burgess v. Ratliff
as 5:2024cv06136
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff v. Lyde et al
as 7:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
edward Michael ratliff
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County Tx, John Swenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burgess v. Ratliff
as 2:2024cv00077
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-2832
Defendant:
KATHY ASHCRAFT, LISA WILLIAMS, ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RATLIFF
The Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts v. Ratliff
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
The Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts
Defendant:
David Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ratliff v. Shelby County Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02702
Respondent:
Shelby County Justice Center
Petitioner:
James D. Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ryan Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-2688
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., ZACH COOK, ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RATLIFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.