Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Clark v. West Dealership et al
as 5:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Patrick Clark
Defendant:
Jeffery Osel, Nissan West Dealership, Raul Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Luis Rodriguez, et al v. Imperial Brands, PLC., et al
as 24-11487
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, MARIA RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO RAMON FORNS and others
Defendant:
IMPERIAL BRANDS, PLC., CORPORACION HABANOS, S.A., WPP, PLC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodriguez v. St Joseph Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv06147
Plaintiff:
Joel Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
St Joseph Police Department, St Joseph Police Department, Internal Affairs, Cristobal Estevan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Romero v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03310
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez-Romero
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Burgess et al
as 4:2023cv03228
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin
Defendant:
Marilyn Burgess, Judge Shannon Baldwin, Judge Genesis Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Jose Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and George Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
