Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Juan Marshall Rayford et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 5:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
JUAN MARSHALL RAYFORD and DUPREE ANTOINE GLASS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CHRISTOPHER KEELING, STEVEN GROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rayford v. City of Schertz et al
as 5:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Zekee Rayford
Defendant:
City of Schertz, Michael R. Hansen, Chavarria Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hall-Rayford et al v. Owens et al
as 2:2022cv12714
Plaintiff:
Mary Hall-Rayford, Karen Beltz, Karen Mouradjian and others
Defendant:
Monique Owens and Eastpointe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. City of Bellefontaine Neighbors et al
as 4:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Wilson Individually doing business as Wilcorp Consultants, LLC
Defendant:
City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, Brian Anthony Rayford and John W. Laumeir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hebrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv02929
Plaintiff:
Elimelech Shmi Hebrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Rayford O Irvin and Christian D. Menefee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Rayford
as 2:2021cv00127
Respondent:
J Rayford
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
