Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dean v. Lim et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Defendant:
Ofc./Sgt. Readon, FSS Lim, Sgt. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Reardon et al
as 6:2023cv06455
Plaintiff:
Michael Walsh
Defendant:
P. Reardon, D. DebeJan, James Comey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cato v. Reardon
as 23-471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason E.T. Cato, AKA Jason Cato
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick Reardon, Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility, Schneider, Deputy Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility, Murphy, Correction Officer; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01275
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Reardon
as 9:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
Malik Dawson
Respondent:
Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adamson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Adamson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, David DeBejian, E. Pfendler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
