Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Reardon v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv02736
Plaintiff:
Annie L. Reardon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Smith v. Jon Ozmint
as 10-6526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, GARY D. MAYNARD, ROBERT WARD and others
Valencia-Valencia v. Newman et al
as 5:2010ct03016
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Valencia-Valencia
Defendant:
Ralph Newman, Jean Zula and Maureen Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owens v. Maryland Department of Human Resources Social Services Administration et al
as 1:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
Edward Reynolds Owens, III
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Human Resources Social Services Administration, Karen Young, Fred Blow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County Public Schools
as 08-1256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR., next of kin and friends of B.N.H. and B.S.H. and CHANTE' N. HODGE, next of kin or friends of B.N.H. and B.S.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ROBERT L. GRAY, CCPS, Board Member President, ROBIN WELSH, CCPS, Assistant Superintendent and others
Hodge et al v. Calvert County Public Schools et al.
as 8:2007cv03207
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr. and Chante' N. Hodge
Defendant:
Calvert County Public Schools, Robert L. Gray, Robin Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kevin Smith v. Lester Hinson, Jr.
as 07-6558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, GARY D. MAYNARD, ROBERT WARD and others
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
