Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07614
Plaintiff:
REGINALD FORD
Defendant:
3M COMAPNY and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Ford v. Coastal Drilling Company, LLC Employee Benefit Trust
as 4:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Mr. Reginald Ford
Defendant:
Coastal Drilling Company, LLC Employee Benefit Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50949
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11290
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford-Reyes et al v. Progressive Funeral Home et al
as 1:2019cv01229
Plaintiff:
Joel Ford, Trayce Ford-Reyes, Tyna Kirk and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Progressive Funeral Home and D&S Associated Deliver Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Gordon et al
as 6:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tavares Douglas Harris
Defendant:
Darrel Gordon, Mikasa Cooper, William Summersett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC
as 4:2016cv00861
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
