Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Franklin et al
as 6:2023cv02424
Plaintiff:
Reginald Simmons
Defendant:
Kimberly Franklin, Albert Franklin, Orlando Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv02671
Plaintiff:
Reginald Simmons
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Simmons v. Laurent
as 6:2022cv01943
Plaintiff:
Reginald Simmons
Defendant:
Gisela Thon Laurent
Interested Party:
Tiffany Philips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05444
Plaintiff:
Reginald Simmons
Defendant:
Kenneth Brink, City of Chicago, Adrian Rosiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
Reginald Simmons
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reginald Simmons v. United State
as 16-2855
Petitioner:
Reginald Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Simmons v. USA
as 4:2016cv01005
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Reginald Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Simmons v. Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02842
Defendant:
Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation , Roosevelt Island Public Safety Department , Gristedes 59 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Simmons
Cross_claimant:
Hernandez , Jeffrey Laszczych , Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Angelo Adorno, Artie Farrell, Gristedes 59 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv02220
Plaintiff:
MARY JAMES, BEN ALLEN, ROOSEVELT GATERS and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
