Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Landmark Condominium Association et al v. Continental Casualty Company et al
as 2:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Landmark Condominium Association, Thomas E Stern, Unknown Stern and others
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Richard Barlow v. Clarence White
as 22-6304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD LARUE BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARENCE WHITE, Institutional Program Manager, St. Brides Correctional Center, DARA WATSON, Warden, St. Brides Correction Center and CHRISTOPHER WALTON, Offender Workforce Development Specialist, St. Brides Correctional Center, Individually and in their Official Capacity
Barlow et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2021cv01867
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Barlow, Richard Clifton Barlow, Jr. and Richard Clifton Barlow, Jr
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Barlow et al
as 1:2020cv01458
Defendant:
Dara Watson, Christopher Walton and Clarence White
Plaintiff:
Richard LaRue Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05758
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Barlow, Sr.
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barlow v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Barlow, Sr.
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVERETT v. CARCHMAN et al
as 3:2009cv01903
Plaintiff:
WARREN LEVERETT
Defendant:
PHILIP CARCHMAN, CHARLES WALDRON, FRANK DEITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES V US
as 03-5159
Plaintiff-Appellant:
AARON R. BILLINGS, AGUSTIN DIAZ, JR., AGUSTIN LOPEZ and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
