Cases 21 - 30 of 67
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16608
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRETT RICHARD WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18965
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WALLACE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15634
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WALLACE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Richard Wallace
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WALLACE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00951
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WALLACE
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Medeiros
as 1:2016cv12540
Petitioner:
Richard Wallace
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Coonts v. Randolph County Commission
as 16-1537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM WAYNE COONTS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMISSION, RANDLOPH COUNTY PROSECUTORS' OFFICE, PHILLIP ISNER and others
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES
Taylor v. Center Point Recovery for Men et al
as 5:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joe Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Center Point Recovery for Men, Jay Swenney, Alan Manuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Asure Software, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00475
Defendant:
Asure Software, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Wallace
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wallace v. Elmira CF
as 6:2015cv06060
Petitioner:
Richard Wallace
Respondent:
Elmira CF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
