Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Meyers v. Joyce McDowell
as 23-6992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, PREA Facility Compliance Manager, MS. COVINGTON, PREA Coordinator of Scotland Correctional Institute, CHIEF AND MANAGER AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. MCDOWELL
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, P.R.E.A. CORRDINATOR MS. COVINGTON, CHIEF AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVID DAVIS and RICTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. Medical Department et al
as 5:2012cv00472
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
Medical Department, WEBB, MCARMUREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dreismeier v. Fauvel, et al
as 12-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH J. DREISMEIER
Defendant - Appellee:
MAURICE FAUVEL, NICOLE WILSON and WILLIAM RICTER
Dreismeier v. Fauvel et al
as 1:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dreismeier
Defendant:
Maurice Fauvel, Nicole Wilson and William Ricter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lattin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2012cv00029
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Correctional Officer Ricter and Correctional Officer Walker
Plaintiff:
Brett Mathew Lattin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lattin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brett Mathew Lattin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Walker and FNU Ricter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
