Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Haugland v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00375
Plaintiff:
Theodore Haugland
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Ring LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heidary v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv04192
Plaintiff:
Massoud Heidary
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc. and Ring LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Santullo et al
as 1:2025cv09861
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
JOSEPH SANTULLO, 29 RING LLC and TATE NEIDERER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
Manley v. Bushby et al
as 4:2025cv00263
Defendant:
Craig William Bushby, Margarita Rosa Caro, Blue Cross Blue Shield and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Amos Manley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emile Dominique, IV v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc, et al
as 24-3089
Defendant:
WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC, (Jehovah's Witnesses), MIKE JOHNSON, COMCAST and others
Plaintiff:
EMILE J. DOMINIQUE, IV
Onscreen Dynamics, LLC v. Sonic Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00710
Defendant:
SAI McKinney M, LLC, Bonham CHR, LLC, Sonic Automotive, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Onscreen Dynamics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Onscreen Dynamics, LLC v. Sewell Automotive Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Onscreen Dynamics, LLC
Defendant:
UDM Company, LLC, DFW Rings, LLC, Sewell Automotive Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heidary v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1580
Plaintiff:
MASSOUD HEIDARY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and RING, LLC
Massoud Heidary v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
MASSOUD HEIDARY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and RING LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
