Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Thomas v. Tulsa County Sheriff, et al
as 24-5057
Plaintiff:
BYRON C. THOMAS
Defendant:
TULSA COUNTY SHERIFF, UNITED STATES MARSHALS, U.S. DEPUTY MARSHAL JOEY POFFEL and others
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Tulsa County Sheriff et al
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Bryon C Thomas and Byron C Thomas
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff, United States Marshals, Joey Poffel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Boneberg
as 24-10153
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg and Risk Management
Kolek v. Curry County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kolek
Defendant:
Curry County Board of Commissioners, Curry County Risk Management Division and Curry County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Boneberg et al
as 4:2023cv01205
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg and Risk Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Omarr J. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Portland, City of Portland Police and City of Portland Risk Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. McIntosh et al
as 9:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Willie Bright
Defendant:
D. McIntosh, Earl Bell, Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Division of Risk Management
as 7:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamonte Holloman
Defendant:
Division of Risk Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
