Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ritchie et al v. Luminis Health, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03663
Plaintiff:
Angela Ritchie and Rachel Rogers
Defendant:
Luminis Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ritchie, Adam v. Hannah, Karen et al
as 3:2026cv00934
Plaintiff:
Adam Ritchie
Defendant:
Karen Hannah, Nicole Brown, Warden Tim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hofmann et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2026cv00947
Plaintiff:
Ritchie Hofmann and Wanda Hofmann
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Ritchie
as 26-5718
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DONALD LAWRENCE RITCHIE
United States of America v. Ritchie
as 3:2026cv00312
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donald Lawrence Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ritchie v. Veradigm Inc.
as 1:2026cv10290
Plaintiff:
Jenny Ritchie
Defendant:
Veradigm Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ritchie v. English et al
as 3:2026cv01253
Plaintiff:
Travis Ritchie
Defendant:
English, Dice, Thompson-Youker and others
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RITCHIE v. SALMON
as 5:2026cv00231
Petitioner:
CARLOS IGNATIOUS RITCHIE
Respondent:
KAHLIA VANITA SALMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nesbit v. Ritchie et al
as 5:2026cv03560
Plaintiff:
Andre Nesbit
Defendant:
Carl Ritchie and Charleston, The City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ritchie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00385
Plaintiff:
Joel D Ritchie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
