Cases 1 - 10 of 25
GRUBBS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20034
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRUBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grubb v. Presidio Investors, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02191
Defendant:
Presidio Investors, LLC, Victor Masaya and Victor (I) Masaya
Plaintiff:
Robert Grubb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201
Eloise Hitchcock, et al v. Cumberland Univ 403(B) D, et al
as 16-5942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELOISE HITCHCOCK and SHERYL KAE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRUBB
Defendant - Appellee:
CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY 403(B) DC PLAN, CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY and JOHN DOES 1-10
Hitchcock et al v. Cumberland University 403(B) DC Plan et al
as 3:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Eloise Hitchcock , Sheryl Kae and Robert Grubb
Defendant:
Cumberland University 403(B) DC Plan, Cumberland University and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roger Johnson v. Dale Caskey, et al
as 13-60567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN DALE CASKEY, WARDEN BART GRIMES, WARDEN R. GILLESPIE and others
Johnson v. Caskey et al
as 4:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Roger Cal Johnson
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes, R. Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natasha Whitley v. John Hanna, et al
as 12-10312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATASHA WHITLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN NICK HANNA, ROBERT BULLOCK, MICHAEL MURRAY and others
Roger Johnson v. Dale Caskey, et al
as 11-60623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE CASKEY, BART GRIMES, R. GILLESPIE and others
Whitley v. Hanna et al
as 6:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
Natasha Whitley
Defendant:
John Nick Hanna , Robert Bullock , Michael Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
