Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Eggett v. Patterson UTI Drilling Co et al
as 2:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Patterson UTI Drilling Co and Robert Sizemore
Plaintiff:
Chad Eggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SIZEMORE v. DEARMITT et al
as 2:2019cv01680
Defendant:
EDWARD DEARMITT, SUPERIOR COURT and DONALD WALKO
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SIZEMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sizemore et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv00704
Plaintiff:
Charolette Sizemore and Robert Sizemore
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIZEMORE v. BROOKS
as 2:2018cv01123
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SIZEMORE
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROOKS and DR. MICHAEL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Sizemore v. Thomas Kahler, et al
as 16-2838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SIZEMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. KAHLER and BOROUGH OF WEST MIFFLIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Sizemore et al
as 2:2015cv00797
Defendant:
Robert Sizemore and Sleepy Dog Saloon and Brewery LLC
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Sizemore et al
as 2:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Robert Sizemore and Sleepy Dog Saloon and Brewery LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
SIZEMORE v. KAHLER et al
as 2:2014cv01175
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SIZEMORE
Defendant:
THOMAS J. KAHLER and WEST MIFFLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sizemore v. Shoshone County et al
as 2:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Robert Sizemore
Defendant:
Shoshone County , Charles Reynalds and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
