Cases 1 - 10 of 1,748
Wehner v. Genentech, Inc., et al.
as 24-2630
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEHNER
Defendant:
GENENTECH, INC. and UNITED STATES ROCHE DC FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE
18-00003 IH Borrower LP v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
2018-3 IH Borrower LP
Defendant:
John Doe and Herman Roche-Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Bobulinski v. Dickson et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
Tony Bobulinski
Defendant:
Hugh Dickson, Hickory Grove, LLC, Jake Fisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Centeno-Roches v. Garland
as 24-807
Petitioner:
ERLIN TOMAS CENTENO-ROCHES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Rubio v. The City of Alexandria Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Yasmani Gurri Rubio
Defendant:
The City of Alexandria Virginia, Justin M. Wilson, ADP Cody Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ullah v.Golden Express Auto Transport Corp.. et al
as 1:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Arif Ullah
Defendant:
Golden Express Auto Transport Corp., Serguey Rios-Roche and Reinaldo Aguila Guerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Monahan v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kate Elizabeth Roche Monahan
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Roche v. SCI-Mahanoy RHU et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Roche
Defendant:
SCI-Mahanoy RHU, Department of Correction Facility, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
