Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jones v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01181
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv00901
Defendant:
Yoksoulian, Tom Dart and C.C.D.O.C. Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silas v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00928
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, Rodney Jones, Billy Sparkman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Silas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Harris County Sheriff's
as 4:2019cv00649
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's, Harris County, Harris County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00508
Defendant:
MDOC, MTC, Lt. R. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Leronia Reed, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Burkes et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Jones, Warden Unknown Rice, Captain Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Jones v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 15-2817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS RODNEY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Jones v. Joyner
as 3:2014cv00420
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
FNU Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2014cv01153
Petitioner:
CURTIS RODNEY JONES
Respondent:
GLUNT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
