Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rios v. 223 West Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv03134
Plaintiff:
Michael Rios
Defendant:
223 West Corp., 692 10th Avenue LLC, Its Him LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06819
Defendant:
Exactech, U.S., Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jannie Anderson and Carman Ronald Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Anderson v. Harrish
as 1:2024cv00290
Defendant:
FNU Harrish
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Weeks, et al.
as 24-4427
Defendant:
DANIEL VERDUGO, RONALD ANDERSON, DOES, Unknown Employees of the City of Corona and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY LONG
Charles, et al. v. Chapman, et al.
as 1:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Lindsay McCarty, Heather Sabbatino, Ronald Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Chelsea Management et al
as 1:2024cv01424
Defendant:
Ridge Gardens 2020 LLC and Chelsea Management
Plaintiff:
Tomika Thompson, Ronald Anderson and Dre'Shawn Winston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Breach of Contract
Anderson v. Danila
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Danila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Indivior, Inc. et al
as 1:2024sf65016
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
