Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Francis v. MarineMax Services, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis
Defendant:
MarineMax Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Francis v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06493
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ronald Croteau
as 15-11720
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD FRANCIS CROTEAU
Cameron v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Petitioner:
Ronald Francis Cameron
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Francis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06166
Defendant:
City of New York, Andrew Erato, John and Jane Doe 1 through 15 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conniff v. Hollenback
as 5:2014hc02132
Petitioner:
Ronald Francis Conniff
Respondent:
S. Hollenback
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ronald-Francis: of the family Croteau v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ronald-Francis: of the family Croteau
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Grady I. Ingle and Elizabeth B. Ells
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Ronald-Francis: of the family Croteau v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ronald-Francis: of the family Croteau
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Grady I. Ingle and Elizabeth B. Ells
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Francis et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01546
Defendant:
Brian Christensen, City of New York, Adam Dumelle and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis and Nicole Hunter-Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02652
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
