Cases 11 - 20 of 38
GAULT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00122
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL KEITH GAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GAULT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL KEITH GAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Russell Howard v. BCBS-AZ, et al
as 19-16554
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNSTATE EQUIPMENT CO. LLC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN and BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ARIZONA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL KEITH HOWARD
Howard v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
as 2:2016cv03769
Plaintiff:
Russell Keith Howard
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
as 4:2016cv02622
Plaintiff:
Russell Keith Howard
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN et al v. USA
as 1:2015cv01297
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS G. BROWN , MARY LOUISE KELLEY , RUSSELL KEITH and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 14-7645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TAXPAYERS, CITY OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS and others
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 14-6159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, #950R1005342; Claim Date 10-29-10; Judge Garfinkel, seal on 10-29-10, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TAXPAYERS, PEOPLE OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS and others
JOHNSON et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv01642
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
