Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv10638
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Eresian v. Zobel et al
as 4:2017cv40106
Plaintiff:
Ara Eresian, Jr.
Defendant:
Rya W Zobel, Residential Funding Company, LLC, RESCAP Securities Holdings Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Rya Zobel
as 12-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
RYA W. ZOBEL, Judge, Individual and Official Capacities, LEO T. SOROKIN, Magistrate Judge, in Official Capacity, TWO UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, in Official Capacity and others
Alfred Fraser, et al v. Gorton's Inc., et al
as 12-2247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. FRASER
Plaintiff:
PAUL FRASER and GEORGE KERSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GORTON'S INC.
Defendant:
LAWRENCE T. STANLEY, JR., BINGHAM, MCCUTCHEN, LLP, VICTOR H. POLK, JR. and others
Azubuko v. Zobel et al
as 1:2012cv00871
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Rya W. Zobel, Leo T Sorokin, Two Unknown United States' Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fraser, et al v. Gorton's Inc., et al
as 12-1846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. FRASER
Plaintiff:
PAUL FRASER and GEORGE KERSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GORTON'S INC., HIGH LINER FOODS (USA), INC., PINNACLE FOODS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
LAWRENCE T. STANLEY, JR., BINGHAM, MCCUTCHEN, LLP, VICTOR H. POLK, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
