Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Mitchell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mitchell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mitchell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tony Ryan Mitchell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mitchell, Jr. et al v. WGU Corporation
as 1:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mitchell, Jr. and Brady Misner
Defendant:
WGU Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act/Junk Fax Prevention Act
HARE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02745
Plaintiff:
RYAN MITCHELL HARE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19223
Plaintiff:
RYAN MITCHELL LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03831
Plaintiff:
RYAN MITCHELL CHILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. McCraken et al
as 9:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mitchell
Defendant:
Austin McCraken and Polk County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEATHMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22635
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MITCHELL HEATHMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. DOUGLAS ELLIMAN FLORIDA, LLC et al
as 9:2020cv81985
Defendant:
Nicola A. Higgins, Christina Bill, DOUGLAS ELLIMAN FLORIDA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86479
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
