Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brandt v. Martin et al
as 3:2021cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jamey M Brandt
Defendant:
Kevin Martin, Bryce Garman, Corey Blodgett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Sanofi-Aventis US LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04324
Plaintiff:
Rachel Scott
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv01857
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Rachelle Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott v. Buncich et al
as 2:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Tamara Rachel Scott
Defendant:
John Buncich , County of Lake , Willie Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balch et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2014cv10380
Plaintiff:
Erica Balch and Rachel Scott
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Scott et al
as 5:2013cv00897
Defendant:
Mica Rachelle Scott, Jane Doe, Mica Todd and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Scott v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv10209
Plaintiff:
Rachel Scott
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. OPIS Management Resources, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00292
Plaintiff:
Rachel Scott
Defendant:
OPIS Management Resources, LLC and Marilyn G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rachel Scott
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BENISH et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06289
Plaintiff:
DONALD BENISH , YVONNE GLASS , BETTY GLOSSON and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
