Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Smith et al v. Gomez, et al
as 2:2017cv04601
Plaintiff:
Andrea Gomez Smith and Matthew Eric Gomez
Defendant:
Mark Andrew Gomez, Aurelio Rafael Gomez, David Brent Gomez and others
Third_party_defendant:
Empower Retirement, Kayla Addison and Western Surety Company
Third_party_plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Gomez
Counter_claimant:
Mark Andrew Gomez
Counter_defendant:
Matthew Eric Gomez and Andrea Gomez Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Diaz v. Sessions et al
as 1:2017cv24246
Defendant:
Thomas Homan, Juan Acosta and Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gomez Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Rafael Uranga
as 17-11497
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAFAEL GOMEZ URANGA
Gomez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02377
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gomez and Hector Marquez
Defendant:
City of New York, Lawrence Thomas, Gregory Danca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gomez et al v. True Leaf Farms, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv02928
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gomez , Cesar Ruelas and Brenda Acevedo
Defendant:
True Leaf Farms, LLC , True Leaf Holdings, LLC , Church Brothers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Gomez Tix et al v. Estes Lawn & Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01677
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gomez Tix , Bairon Yobani Morales Mendez , Manuel Chijal Ventura and others
Defendant:
Estes Lawn & Landscaping, Inc. and Harvey F. Estes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Rafael Gomez
as 15-5102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAFAEL GOMEZ
Rafael Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72777
Petitioner:
RAFAEL GOMEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
United States of America v. Rafael Gomez
as 4:2014mc01164
Respondent:
Rafael Gomez
Petitioner:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
