Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rodriguez v. Cova, Inc.
as 1:2026cv26206
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rodriguez
Defendant:
Cova, Inc., d/b/a Versailles Restaurant Cuban Cuisine
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez Izaguirre v. The United States of America
as 8:2026cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bryan Rafael Rodriguez Izaguirre
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 7:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Rodriguez et al v. New York Fruit King Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03337
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rodriguez and Rafael Rodriguez
Defendant:
Shimon Braun and New York Fruit King Inc. doing business as Fruits-A-Plenty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01448
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv60932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv60831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCCLINE v. KELLY et al
as 2:2026cv02918
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. MCCLINE, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL KELLY, SCOTT PHILLIPS, RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00894
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
