Cases 1 - 10 of 327
Blais Cunningham & Crowe Chester, LLP v. Patel et al
as 3:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Blais Cunningham & Crowe Chester, LLP and Blais Title & Escrow, LLC
Defendant:
Rahul Patel, Adnan Akhtar, Gregory Dabney and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
MATTA v. KAUR et al
as 2:2024cv05743
Plaintiff:
RAHUL MATTA
Defendant:
ANTER PREET KAUR, HARINDER PAL SINGH, KAMALJIT KAUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dipak Patel v. Hero, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Dipak Patel
Defendant:
Hero, LLC, Rahul Arya, Hitesh Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
In Re: For Judicial Assistance
as 2:2024mc00119
Not Yet Classified:
For Judicial Assistance in Obtaining Evidence for Use in Foreign International Proceedings
Petitioner:
Rahul Sharma
Miller v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc., Rami Rahim, Anne Delsanto and others
Smith v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc., Rami Rahim, Anne DelSanto and others
Kaur, D.D.S. et al v. Jeorgos et al
as 1:2024cv10548
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. and Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. P.C.
Defendant:
Elvisa Jeorgos, Tyanna Yaman, Aparna Khanna, D.M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Zaita v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
John Zaita
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc., Rami Rahim, Anne DelSanto and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
