Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Rahul Malhotra v. University of Illinois at Urbana, et al
as 22-2469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHUL MALHORTA and RAHUL MALHOTRA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA, -CHAMPAIGN, RONY DIE and JOHN DOES, 1-30
Jason Scott Collection, Inc. v. Trendily Furniture, LLC, et al
as 21-16978
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASON SCOTT COLLECTION, INC., an Arizona corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
TRENDILY FURNITURE, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, TRENDILY HOME COLLECTION, LLC, a Texas limited liability company and RAHUL MALHOTRA, an individual
Malhotra v. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign et al
as 2:2021cv02220
Plaintiff:
Rahul Malhotra
Defendant:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Rony Die and Does 1-30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanna et al v. Malhotra
as 1:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Hanna Law Firm, P.C., Jon Hanna and Hanna Law Firm PC
Defendant:
Rahul Malhotra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jason Scott Collection Incorporated v. Trendily Furniture LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02712
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Collection Incorporated
Defendant:
Trendily Furniture LLC , Trendily Home Collection LLC , Rahul Malhotra and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
McLeod et al v. Valve Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01227
Defendant:
Valve Corporation, Thomas Cassell, James Varga and others
Plaintiff:
McLeod, Samuel Joines, Sam Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Malhotra v. Rev Worldwide, Inc.
as 4:2013cv03768
Plaintiff:
Rahul Malhotra
Defendant:
Rev Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
