Cases 1 - 10 of 47
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Raimos
as 24-563
Respondent:
ALEX RAIMOS, Aleandro Claudio Sr., Al Claudio and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Eresian Jr. v. Arcuri et al
as 4:2023cv40028
Plaintiff:
Ara Eresian Jr. and Erik C. Krowel
Defendant:
Tracy Krowel, Santo Arcuri, John B. Raimo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hilton v. Caringi et al
as 9:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
James D. Hilton
Defendant:
Caringi, Mahan, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. LaValley et al
as 9:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
LaValley, C.O. Kelly, Duray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00748
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
New York SMSA Limited Partnership v. The Town of Bedford et al
as 7:2021cv03742
Defendant:
The Town of Bedford Planning Board, The Town of Bedford Town Board, Alberto Ciraco, Building Inspector and others
Plaintiff:
New York SMSA Limited Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Intervenor Defendant:
John Santos, Jeremy Randol, Jesse Randol and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
JOHNSON v. RAIMOS et al
as 5:2020cv00234
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
GANDY and RAIMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raimo v. Washington University in St. Louis
as 4:2020cv00634
Defendant:
Washington University in St. Louis
Plaintiff:
Alexander Raimo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raimo v. Carr
as 1:2019cv04274
Respondent:
State of Connecticut and Christopher Carr
Petitioner:
Tamir Raimo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raimo v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02346
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sean Raimo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
