Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Booher v. Dale et al
as 5:2022cv06014
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Booher and Ronnie Wayne Booher, I
Defendant:
Douglas Dale, Andrew Callaway, Randy Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Joiner v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Randy Joiner
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Bosenko et al
as 2:2009cv02439
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
Tom Bosenko, Ryan Henrioulle, John Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Harlan, et al v. Dept of Health and Human Svc, et al
as 09-20207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HARLAN and MARVINELL HARLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH ROUSE, Individual Capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KENDRICK SMALL, Attorney, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlan et al v. Department Of Health And Human Services et al
as 4:2008cv01943
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harlan and Marvinell Harlan
Defendant:
Department Of Health And Human Services, Ralph Rouse, Kenneth Small and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harlan v. TX Dept of Protc, et al
as 08-20030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVINELL HARLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAN PETREY, FAD Program Director, RANDY JOINER, THOMAS CHAPMOND and others
Gates, et al v. TX Dept Protective, et al
as 4:2002cv00495
Plaintiff:
Gary Gates and Melissa Gates
Defendant:
Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Thomas Chapmond, Karen Sheehan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Texas State Teachers Association and Texas Association of School Boards Legal Assistance Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
