Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Woodmans Food Market Inc
as 2:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Terry Robertson and Ray Barnes
Defendant:
Woodman's Food Market Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robertson et al v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06652
Plaintiff:
Terry Robertson and Ray Barnes
Defendant:
Woodman's Food Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barnes v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray Barnes
Defendant:
Karina Joya-Medina and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86064
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RAY BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutton v. Barnes, Jr. et al
as 1:2020cv03997
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and Thomas Ray Barnes, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes v. Jackson et al
as 5:2020ct03152
Defendant:
Mr. Mobley, Denise Jackson, Germel S. Wilkins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Waddel et al
as 5:2020ct03120
Defendant:
Warden Waddel, Correctional Officer Wheeler and Warden Waddell
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01255
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jimmy Ray Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gregory v. Barnes et al
as 3:2017cv00923
Defendant:
Terry Ray Barnes and Robertson County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Dewey Lee Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
