Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Irvin v. USA
as 4:2016cv00389
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Texas Serenity Academy, Inc. et al v. Glaze et al
as 4:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Texas Serenity Academy, Inc. , Michelle Foreman , Larry Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Samuel Glaze , Raphael Baez , Ray Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Dodge Intrepid 2000 VIN #2B3HD56J8YH174833
as 4:2011cv00488
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Dodge Intrepid 2000 VIN #2B3HD56J8YH174833
Claimant:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Irvin v. USA
as 4:2010cv00107
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Kenneth Irvin
as 09-1658
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Gary Holt v. George Bush
as 08-5389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary William Holt
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gwyndell Declerk, Michael James Holmes, Jack C. Reed and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George W. Bush, Michael B. Mukasey, In their Individual Capacities, Barack Obama, President of the United States of America and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Charles E. Nance, Jr. and Wilfredo G. Lora
HOLT et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01043
Plaintiff:
GARY WILLIAM HOLT, GWYNDELL DELERCK, MICHAEL JAMES HOLMES and others
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Irvin v. USA
as 4:2007cv01152
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
