Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Nelson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Marcus Ray Nelson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.55 Acre Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.55 Acre Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Kenneth Bowen, Jan R. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
USA v. Nelson
as 21-20576
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Ray Nelson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Marcus Nelson
as 21-2683
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marcus Ray Nelson
Nelson v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00145
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC., THE UNLAUB COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Ray Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nelson #630619 v. Davids et al
as 1:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Unknown Jex, Unknown Davids, Unknown Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Luster Ray Nelson #630619, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson #630619 v. Yuhas et al
as 1:2020cv01256
Defendant:
Unknown Yuhas and Unknown Simon
Plaintiff:
Luster Ray Nelson #630619, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Nelson
as 5:2020cv00033
Defendant:
Laura Nelson
Plaintiff:
Ray Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson #630619 v. Matthew et al
as 1:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Unknown Simia, Unknown Williamson, Unknown Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Luster Ray Nelson #630619, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
